Category: Business News

  • Ryanair's Michael O'Leary: UK in denial over Brexit impact

    Ryanair CEO Michael O’Leary says the UK is denial about the possible impact of Brexit on flights.

  • British Airways apologises for check-in failure

    BA planesImage copyright
    PA

    British Airways has apologised for a “temporary” problem with its check-in systems at some UK airports.

    Passengers at Heathrow, Gatwick and London City airports had to be checked in manually and faced long queues and delays.

    BA said the fault was resolved at about 09:00 BST and its computerised system was now operating normally.

    It comes after a power cut led to hundreds of flights being cancelled over the May bank holiday weekend.

    A spokesman for BA said: “We are sorry for the temporary check-in problems which caused some delays for our customers first thing this morning.

    “This issue is now resolved and our staff are working flat out to help customers get away on their holidays.”

  • Rules ‘should not be watered down’ for Aramco listing

    Aramco oil fieldImage copyright
    AFP

    Regulators should not “water down” the rules to allow the world’s largest oil company to list in London, the Institute of Directors (IoD) has said.

    It follows reports Saudi Aramco plans to list 5% of its shares in London or on another Western stock exchange.

    UK rules state more than 25% of shares should be listed to stop a single shareholder having too much dominance.

    But proposals by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) put forward in January could allow for exceptions.

    The regulator proposed waiving a number of requirements for sovereign-owned companies, including the need to provide independent shareholders with their own separate vote on the appointment of independent directors.

    ‘Protections in place’

    Steve Martin, director general of the IOD, questioned whether the FCA’s plans were being made for “short term gain”.

    According to reports, Saudi Aramco could be valued at $2tn (£1.5tn) when it lists – a huge price tag that would also generate hundreds of millions of dollars in fees for investment bankers, lawyers and other professional firms involved in stock market flotations.

    Mr Martin told Radio 4’s Today programme: “The UK has the highest standard of corporate governance and shareholders know that when they invest in a company, certain protections will be in place, especially to protect minority shareholders.

    “We would not want to see those rules removed without good reason.”

    He added: “It’s in the interest of companies like Saudi Aramco to adhere to our requirements because it demonstrates their commitment to good corporate governance.”

    ‘Highly inappropriate’

    In January, the FCA said it wanted to create a new category of share listing, aimed at state-controlled companies such as Aramco.

    It said these firms “tend to be different from private sector individuals or entities in both their motivations and their nature”.

    In June, pension fund Royal London Asset Management also criticised the proposals, saying an Aramco listing should not go ahead if it weakened protections.

    Ashley Hamilton Claxton, corporate governance manager at Royal London, said at the time: “It would be highly inappropriate for us to be bending listing rules and bending benchmark rules to accommodate this one large company.”

  • Older women poorer after pension age change, says IFS

    Two pensioners walking in West SussexImage copyright
    PA

    More than a million women in their early 60s have become poorer as a result of delays to their state pensions, according to a new study.

    Researchers at the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) found that, on average, women aged between 60 and 62 were now £32 a week worse off.

    As a result poverty rates among that group have risen sharply, it said.

    But the IFS also said the savings, and extra tax from working women, meant the state was £5.1bn a year better off.

    Public sector debt is £1.75 trillion and the government borrowed £46.2bn in the past financial year.

    The government said its pensions policy was “fair and sustainable” and matched continuing rises in life expectancy.

    However, the campaign group WASPI (Women Against State Pension Age Inequality) said the research was shocking.

    “Once again, this shows that the government has implemented state pension age (SPA) reforms without adequately considering the full impact of these changes on the women affected,” said WASPI director, Jane Cowley.

    “Whether it is the 3.5 million WASPI women who were not given sufficient warning of rises to their state pension age, or the sharp rise in income poverty among 60 to 62-year-old women, the government needs to sit up and start realising that its changes have devastating consequences on the women affected.”

    Working longer

    The IFS study showed that many women in the age group already affected by the pension change have continued working.

    But the effect of waiting longer for their state pension has, on average, outweighed the gains made by those who have continued to earn a salary.

    Thus the female 60-62 age group as a whole was earning an extra £2.5bn a year, an average of £44 per week.

    But the same group has also lost £4.2bn in pension and other benefits per year, or £74 per week.

    Jonathan Cribb, of the IFS, said the new policy was clearly putting pressure on the budgets of some households.

    “The increased state pension age is boosting employment – and therefore earnings – of affected women but this is only partially offsetting reduced incomes from state pensions and other benefits,” he said.

    “Since both rich and poor women are losing out by, on average, roughly similar amounts the reform increases income poverty rates among households containing a woman who has reached age 60 but has not yet reached her state pension age.”

    No material deprivation?

    Looking at the worst affected individuals, the IFS calculated that absolute poverty rates – measured after housing costs – had increased from 15% of women aged between 60 and 62 to 21% of them.

    It said there was no evidence that any of the women were in fact experiencing “material deprivation” -that is, people saying they cannot afford a range of important items.

    Such families may have “smoothed” their spending over time, the researchers suggested.

    Caroline Abrahams, at the charity Age UK, said the IFS figures were “extremely worrying”.

    “While it may have encouraged a number to work longer, many women in their sixties were simply not aware of the rise in SPA and, as was predicted by experts, they have either had too little time to make adequate preparations or have been unable to continue working due to ill health, caring responsibilities or unemployment,” she said.

    But the changes have boosted the government finances.

    The IFS said that the savings to the public purse had been boosted by the extra income tax and national insurance payments from those women continuing to work, which meant the government’s total saving was now running at £5.1bn per year.

    Image copyright
    Getty Images

    The study said there was also an effect on single men in their early 60s, who used to be able to claim pension credit.

    Under the rules, eligibility for pension credit is also being pushed back.

    As a result, single men aged 60 to 62 are on average £21 a week worse off, the study suggests.

    More to come

    The long-standing policy of equalising women’s state pension age with that of men, and then raising it for both groups, has become increasingly controversial.

    The decision to equalise the SPA was first made back in 1995.

    Many women who are being affected say they were never made aware of the changes, which have now come as a shock to them.

    The process kicked off in 2010, with the plan to raise the SPA steadily from age 60 to 65 by the year 2020.

    But then in 2011 the government decided to accelerate the policy.

    The SPA will thus be equalised at 65 two years earlier in 2018, and then rise by another year to 66, by 2020.

    Further increases to 67 and even 68 are in the pipeline.

    With the process still under way, women currently qualify for their state pension at nearly 64.

    A spokesman for the Department of Work and Pensions said: “More people are in work than ever before, including a record 9.9 million older workers.

    “Women retiring today can still expect to receive the state pension for over 24.5 years on average – which is more than any generation before them and several years longer than men.”

  • Are the days of the 99 ice cream cone numbered?

    woman and 99Image copyright
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    Ice-cream firms are experimenting with new flavours beyond vanilla

    We all love Thai curries, Japanese noodles and Indian snacks, so why not Asian-inspired desserts? With the amount of ice cream sold dropping globally, manufacturers are starting to experiment with exotic flavours to whet flagging appetites.

    In late 1944, Major Hunter Reinburg, commanding officer of 122 Squadron of the American Marine Corps, had a hankering for ice cream.

    Not surprising perhaps, since he was posted to the sweltering, jungle-covered South Pacific island of Peleliu.

    So Hunter set his resourceful team of aircraft engineers to work on Operation Freeze.

    After some trial and error, they found that by mounting a large can filled with milk onto the underside of each wing tip of their fighter planes, attaching a stirring shaft to a wind-driven propeller, and then undertaking a training sortie at 30,000 feet, they could supply 100 servicemen with a helping of ice cream every day, whilst simultaneously provoking the Japanese to waste a few shells trying to bring them down.

    Hunter was, however, missing a trick.

    If, instead of flavouring his favourite treat with army-issue cocoa powder, he’d cast his eye around him to see what fruits and spices the South Pacific had to offer, then he really would have been ahead of his time.

    He could have tried lychee, coconut, cardamom, nutmeg or ginger – flavours that ice cream makers are now starting to experiment with.

    Image caption

    Matcha (green tea), lychee and rose ice cream anyone?

    In the 70 years since Hunter went to such lengths to satisfy his passion for frozen dairy desserts, global ice cream brands have spread their reach to almost every corner of the planet. Even in Peleliu he could now probably pick up a Cornetto from his corner store.

    But for many years, flavours from the big international brands remained stubbornly conservative, dominated by chocolate, strawberry and vanilla.

    Now though, thanks to migration, long-haul travel, and the internet, consumers are becoming more adventurous and manufacturers are taking note.

    Parlours have sprung up across the US offering Persian-style saffron, orange blossom, and rosewater ice cream, sprinkled with nuts and drizzled with honey; and Indian-inspired flavours such as masala chai, pineapple, and kulfi.

    Image copyright
    Chinatown Ice cream factory

    Image caption

    Chinatown Ice Cream Factory offers a red bean, toasted sesame, and taro flavour ice-cream

    At Chinatown Ice Cream Factory in New York, where they’ve been offering exotic ice creams for 40 years, they’ve noticed an uptick in interest from customers.

    Owner Christina Seid says there’s often a queue of 20 customers waiting to try her Chinese-inspired range, which includes red bean, toasted sesame, and taro (a kind of sweet potato) ice cream.

    She thinks Americans are ready to embrace these flavours in a way they perhaps weren’t when her parents, Chinese immigrants, first set up the shop.

    “My father was the pioneer of a lot of these flavours. Back then people didn’t even know what a mango or green tea was.

    “Now, nothing is really weird.”

    She thinks red bean flavour, common in China, will eventually become mainstream in the US.

    • China consumed most at 3.3bn litres

    • Norwegians ate the most per head at 9.8 litres

    • Sales grew fastest in India at 13%

    Getty Images

    In many of the world’s biggest ice cream markets appetites have been flagging for traditional take-home tubs. Consumers are worrying about the sugar content and there’s a lot of competition.

    According to market research firm Mintel, global ice-cream sales fell from 15.6bn litres in 2015 to 13bn last year. As a result, firms are watching what happens in places like The Chinatown Ice Cream Factory carefully.

    “Trends are born in the parlours where they can afford to take a gamble,” says Alex Beckett, global food and drink analyst at Mintel.

    “They become fashionable. Then they travel from Brooklyn to LA and Chicago, then to Sydney, London, Berlin, and eventually they will be picked up by manufacturers who will start to set the market for these more ethnic styles”

    Yee Kwan Chan, who is based in the UK city of Sheffield and whose family is also Chinese, travels to far flung parts of the world in search of inspiration for her Yee Kwan line of desserts.

    “I just want to create authentic flavours you’d find in Asia,” she says.

    Image copyright
    Yee Kwan

    Image caption

    Yee Kwan Chan gets ideas for new flavours from her overseas travels

    Her concoctions include chocolate miso, black sesame seed, and durian – the fruit with the pungent odour often likened to sewage or something rotting – which is surprisingly popular in Asia.

    At Christmas she travelled to Hong Kong and is now producing egg custard tart ice cream, evoking the afternoon tea treat popular there.

    “With the East Asian palate we’ve got sweet and we’ve got sour and then we have bitter: we use all our senses,” says Ms Chan.

    Image copyright
    yee kwan

    Image caption

    Yee Kwan Chan believes people are now more willing to try unusual ice cream flavours

    With foreign travel and Asian food so popular, she’s convinced that Asian-inspired flavours will be on the shop shelves in the US and Europe as a matter of course in a few years’ time.

    But for that to happen at any scale, larger manufacturers will also need to get on board.

    Unilever, the world’s largest producer, is open to the idea.

    They already make a myriad of flavours to suit local palates, including red bean Cornettos in China, a liquorice recipe for Scandinavia, and they’ve just launched a “dung dung” ice cream – based on an “earthy” tasting fruit – in Indonesia.

    Matt Close, Unilever’s executive vice president of global ice cream, says they’ve always got an eye out for new flavours that might “travel”.

    Image copyright
    Unilever

    Image caption

    Unilever caters to local tastes with matcha (green tea) and red bean Cornettos


    Global Trade

    More from the BBC’s series taking an international perspective on trade:

    What makes this Kate Spade bag unusual?

    Where’s hot? This summer’s most popular holiday spots

    The lucrative world of ‘the super tutor’

    Read more global trade series here.


    This year in India, the world’s fastest growing ice cream market, they launched a kulfi ice cream, made with condensed milk and flavoured with rose water so it tastes a little like Turkish Delight.

    “I’m absolutely convinced kulfi would work in the UK,” says Mr Close.

    “You’d start where there are big Indian communities, but there is no reason that wouldn’t stretch.”

    While taro and red bean recipes might be harder to export, matcha (green tea) flavours seem likely to be at the forefront of any Asian invasion, he thinks.

    “We’ve just launched a matcha ice cream in the Philippines. We’ll take it to other markets.

    “I’d put money on the idea that there’d be green tea ice cream or green tea ice lollies in most markets in the not too distant future.”


    Three things to try

    Image copyright
    Chinatown Ice Cream Factory

    Booza – also known as Dondurma (in Turkey), this is made with ground powdered orchid root and mastic gum. These ice creams melt more slowly and have a thicker, chewier texture.

    Thai rolled ice cream – the latest Asian ice cream trend involves pouring mixture onto a freezing slab of metal then rolling it up like a piece of paper

    Durian ice cream – only the very adventurous are usually attracted by the the prickly Asian fruit that smells so bad it’s illegal to carry it on the subway in Singapore. An acquired taste.


  • Ready to Join a New Management Team? Here’s How to Do Your Due Diligence First.

    I get emails every week from mid-level and senior executives who want to join a growth company. You’re going to be spending 40-plus hours a week with your new colleagues, which is more time than most of us spend with our spouses. So, I put together some notes on how to perform due diligence on a management team, from the point of view of a prospective colleague. The whole process feels a lot like dating for marriage. This is the process I used when I recently joined HOF Capital.

    Interview the team members (separately).

    You should be interviewing your colleagues just like they’re interviewing you. Ask them for their full resumes. If they can’t provide them, that’s a red flag for how much they value you and how transparent they are willing to be. 

    Related: This Is How You Manage Your Career Like a CEO

    It’s critical to meet people one on one. In a group, the more extroverted personalities will dominate the conversation, but they’re not always the most insightful people. In addition, people in a group are more likely to speak the party line, because they’re self-monitoring to align with the views of their colleagues. One on one, they’re more likely to tell their true opinion. Lastly, you’re going to have to work with everyone — both the talkative and the laconic — so you need to evaluate fit with every one.

    For ideas on what to ask, see “The Master List: Questions to Ask Potential Co-Founders” and “8 Issues You Need to Discuss with Your Startup Co-Founder.”

    Think about cultural fit.

    As a way of getting to know your colleagues, my coach Ben Dattner recommends that you write a “user’s manual” for your co-workers. I did that, shared it with my colleagues, and they in turn shared their user manuals with me. Looking for examples? Linkel Eakman, a prominent limited partner, published his guide: “A Human User Interface … with lots of quirks,” while Jeff Epstein, CEO of Ambassador, posted his

    I also suggest it’s helpful to draw up a list of the areas in which you are most likely to have friction. When you understand the major risk factors you face in working together, you can then discuss how to mitigate them. By analogy, when I was in the process of dating my now-wife, we read Don’t You Dare Get Married Until You Read This!, which is a list of about 500 pre-marriage questions, including “How would you feel if my mother moved in with us?” and “What would you do if I gained 50 pounds?” Typical sources of friction you’ll want to discuss with your future colleagues: equity splits, working hours, number of hours worked and corporate strategy.

    Related: Make Your Resignation Letter Polite, Even When You’re Not Feeling It

    Identify management domains.

    The paper org chart is always different than the shadow org chart of how things happen in an organization. Explicitly ask people: What is your area of responsibility?When you last made a major decision about hiring, firing, new product approvals, investing, etc., who was in the room where it happens? In theory, the CEO controls everything, but in practice that’s never the case (except with a true micro-manager, whom you don’t want to work for).

    I think a great tool for understanding the shadow org chart is to review a group Asana, Trello or Basecamp account where all firm initiatives are listed and prioritized, along with who owns what. It’s also helpful to look at where standard processes are documented, in those platforms, or in a process automation/documentation tool like Process Street.

    Another helpful way to do this: write jointly with your proposed teammates a culture guide to the firm. This could even be posted to the website in summary form. As some models, see Bridgewater’s Principles; Goldman Sachs business principles; Blue Future Partners philosophy; and Brad Feld on TAGFEE.

    Related: 10 Tips for Finding a Job That Will Make You Happy

    Dattner suggests asking, “What are some unique norms or cultural practices at the firm or on the management team that new team members sometimes find out the hard way, and can you please let me know what they are and how to avoid inadvertently violating them?”

    He also adds, “What is the management team’s collective accountability and/or authority, if any?” to see if it really is a team, rather than just a collection of individual silos or tops of different functional pyramids.

    Establish ethical boundaries.

    It’s important to understand the parameters of whom you’d work with. For example, are you and your colleagues comfortable working with:

    • Companies selling alcohol or cannabis, e.g. Privateer Holdings’ investments
    • Companies likely to be a channel for NSFW content, e.g. Zivity
    • Companies selling surveillance and monitoring technology to governments, e.g. NSO Group
    • Companies selling weapons, e.g. Zore X (smart handguns)
    • Companies that provide abortion services
    • Nonprofits or political parties which advocate for political positions with which some of your team members (or you) may not agree
    • Companies with leadership accused of unethical behavior, e.g. sexual harassment
    • Companies with leadership who are prominent supporters of politicians you oppose

    Even though most of the companies you’ll partner with or sell to are not doing anything controversial, you’ll inevitably have opportunities like the above over time, so it’s helpful to get a sense of your joint decision-making filter.

    If all goes well, the next step is to make a smooth transition out of your prior firm, and stick the landing at your new home. 

  • The Best Business Partner Duos of All Time

    Just because you have a bold new business idea doesn’t mean you’re destined for success. In fact, a USA Today article reveals that 50 percent of new companies fail to make it to the five-year mark. And just a third are around to celebrate a decade in business. If you want your venture to go the distance, you need to put in the effort and find others who are willing to do the same.

    Related: The Best Career Advice From Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg and Other Billionaire College Dropouts

    The partners on this list joined forces to make their business dreams realities. Thanks to strong work ethics and complementary skill sets, these famous business partnerships yielded incredible — and enviable — results.

    Whether you’re looking for a business partner or just trying to get your company off the ground, read on to discover how these extraordinary entrepreneurs built their empires.

    (By Andrew DePietro)

    • William Procter net worth: unknown
    • James Gamble net worth: unknown
    • Company: Procter & Gamble — $230 billion net worth

    A humble English candle maker and a poor Irish soap maker created one of the most successful companies in the world, and they had their in-laws to thank for it.

    William Procter and James Gamble married Olivia and Elizabeth Norris, respectively, whose father Alexander Norris suggested his sons-in-law stop competing with each other and start a joint business. On Oct. 31, 1837, in the midst of a recession, the two formed Procter & Gamble Company, which thrived despite stiff competition.

    One reason Procter and Gamble are among the most successful business partners is that they put the company’s welfare above their own. In 1840, both men sold their personal assets in order to build a factory and produce candles of a quality no company in Cincinnati could match. Their modern Central Avenue facility offered canal access, allowing for cheap transportation. The end result was that Procter & Gamble grew into a million-dollar business by 1859.

    • Henry Wells net worth: unknown
    • William Fargo net worth: unknown
    • Company: Wells Fargo — $274 billion net worth

    Henry Wells and William Fargo founded not just one but two major financial companies that have become household names: Wells Fargo and American Express. Having worked for years in the shipping industry, Wells and Fargo founded American Express in 1850 to capitalize on the U.S.’s expanding size and population by offering a fast, reliable delivery service between the East and Midwest. But when gold was discovered in California, Wells and Fargo saw a whole new market emerge.

    When their other partners refused to expand, Wells and Fargo took matters into their own hands. They raised $300,000 and in 1852 founded a new company — Wells Fargo & Company — to bring express shipping to California.

    In 1852, the duo expanded their offerings, forming the popular bank many know today.

    • John D. Rockefeller net worth: $341 billion in 2014 dollars
    • Henry Flagler net worth: unknown
    • Company: Standard Oil. The company is defunct, but it has successors.

    By 1880, Standard Oil controlled the refining of nearly 95 percent of all oil produced in the U.S. John D. Rockefeller rightfully gets most of the credit for founding this industry titan, but his partner Henry M. Flagler played a major role in the company’s success.

    As the main oil refiner in Cleveland, Rockefeller was already making significant sums of money in the 1860s, but he still needed a business partner to complement his skill set. After buying out his original partner, Maurice B. Clark, Rockefeller brought in Ohio grain merchant Henry Flagler in 1867, and the pair formed Standard Oil Company in 1870. Flagler proved to be the ideal business partner to bolster Rockefeller’s strategic vision and resolve, as well as provide a lawyer-like analysis of business contracts.

    The U.S. government ordered the Standard Oil monopoly to break up in 1911, which is also when Rockefeller and Flagler ended their partnership. To this day, you’ll find Rockefeller and Flagler’s company living on through its successors: Mobil, Amoco, Chevron and Exxon.

    • Wilbur Wright net worth: unknown
    • Orville Wright net worth: $10.3 million upon his death in 2015 dollars
    • Company: Curtiss-Wright — $2.21 billion in revenue in 2016

    Orville and Wilbur Wright introduced powered, heavier-than-air human flight at Kitty Hawk, N.C., in 1903. Their success was due not only to years of research and development but also the right mix of personalities and skills. Wilbur handled the business half of the partnership, serving as president of the Wright Company, while Orville was the back-room inventor. However, the brothers always shared credit for their successes.

    The Wright Brothers enjoyed one of the best business partnerships because they were good communicators. According to The One Thing, Wilbur said of the partnership, “Nearly everything that was done in our lives has been the result of conversations, suggestions and discussion between us.”

    The Wright Company lasted from Nov. 22, 1909, until 1915, when Orville sold his interest. But the partners’ legacy lives on today as Curtiss-Wright.

    Related: How Richard Branson Built His $5 Billion Fortune

    • Bill Hewlett net worth: $9 billion in 2000
    • Dave Packard net worth: $4 billion in 1996
    • Company: HP — $55 billion net worth

    Like many of the successful business partners on this list, Bill Hewlett and Dave Packard met in college. While studying at Stanford, Hewlett and Packard discussed forming a company and eventually founded Hewlett-Packard Corporation in 1939.

    From its humble origins as a maker of audio oscillators, HP went on to become a tech giant, producing PCs, printers, software, servers and plenty more. Despite such milestones, Hewlett and Packard also made big mistakes — but they always learned from their failures. When HP tried and failed to compete with rival Tektronix in the oscilloscope market, the duo took away a key lesson that all entrepreneurs should learn: only attack an established competitor if your company can offer something new and exciting.

    Hewlett retired as CEO and was succeeded by John Young in 1978. Both Hewlett and Packard would play unofficial roles in the company for many years. Packard died in 1996, and Hewlett passed on in 2001.

    • Ben Cohen net worth: $150 million
    • Jerry Greenfield net worth: $150 million
    • Company: Ben & Jerry’s — $1.23 billion in revenue in 2015

    Ice cream is big business in the U.S., with the industry as a whole recording $5.15 billion in sales for 2015, and Ben & Jerry’s enjoys a large slice of that (ice cream) pie. But it isn’t the pursuit of profits that puts Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield on the list of the best business partners.

    Giving back was a key part of Cohen and Greenfield’s success. After opening the first Ben & Jerry’s shop in 1978, the duo created the Ben & Jerry’s Foundation in 1985, which donates nearly 8 percent of the company’s earnings to nonprofits across the country. Additionally, Cohen and Greenfield take steps to give back to their employees.

    The pair offer numerous programs designed to benefit employees, including free gym memberships, day care service, college tuition aid and profit-sharing deals. Equally important, Cohen created a greater atmosphere of democracy, having subordinates evaluate their bosses and creating a forum for them to express ideas and concerns. Not surprisingly, Ben & Jerry’s successful policies led many competitors to follow its lead.

    • Bill Gates net worth: $75 billion
    • Paul Allen net worth: $20.1 billion
    • Company: Microsoft — $84.7 billion in revenue in 2016

    It’s hard to imagine a world without Microsoft, but thanks to Bill Gates and Paul Allen, we don’t have to. Microsoft founders Gates and Allen met at Seattle’s Lakeside School and built a friendship out of their shared love of technology, among other things.

    Boasting strong entrepreneurial spirits, Gates and Allen seemed destined for success from the beginning. Instead, one of their first business ventures — Traf-O-Data, launched in 1974 — fell apart in 1980 after failing to find a customer base.

    Gates and Allen rank among the best business partners because they learned from their early failures. Allen said that Traf-O-Data taught him that low-cost microprocessors would be the key to the future of the computer industry — and Microsoft’s success.

    • Warren Buffett net worth: $77 billion
    • Charles Munger net worth: $1.49 billion
    • Company: Berkshire Hathaway — $222.94 billion in revenue in 2016

    Both Omaha natives, Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger created the impressive company that is known today as Berkshire Hathaway. After meeting in 1959, the pair bonded over a shared belief in the value of investing.

    Over the decades, Buffett and Munger have worked closely together, with Buffett serving as chairman and CEO of Berkshire Hathaway and Munger as vice chairman. Part of their success as business partners can be traced to their shared experiences — both men worked for Buffett’s grandfather Ernest, toiling away at the family grocery store in Omaha. However, they also have similar senses of humor.

    In an interview with CNBC, Buffett said, “We have minds that work the same way to a great degree. We find the same things quite humorous (and) the things we deplore we agree on.”

    Due to their similar upbringings, their shared sense of humor and mutual respect for each other, Buffett and Munger were able to forge Berkshire Hathaway into a highly successful company.

    • Steve Jobs net worth: $14.1 billion in 2011
    • Steve Wozniak net worth: $100 million
    • Company: Apple Inc. — $495 billion net worth

    Dynamic duos are common in the tech industry, and the partnership of Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak was no exception. The men became friends at a summer job in 1970, and six years later they founded Apple together.

    What made Jobs and Wozniak successful as business partners were their complementary personalities and skill sets. Wozniak was the hands-on engineer, constantly tinkering with computers. Jobs, on the other hand, was the businessman who intended to change the world — and did so thanks to his ability to sell Apple to corporations and the public alike.

    • Larry Page net worth: $44.1 billion
    • Sergey Brin net worth: $42.9 billion
    • Company: Google — $90 billion in revenue in 2016

    Stanford has a habit of producing some of the best business partners, especially when it comes to the tech industry. Larry Page and Sergey Brin met in a Stanford Ph.D. program in 1995 and eventually collaborated on a project called, “The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine.” The paper would form the foundation for Google.

    Brin and Page still work together to this day. Brin serves as the president of Google’s parent company, Alphabet, and Page is the CEO.

    • Pierre Omidyar net worth: $9 billion
    • Jeffrey Skoll net worth: $4.9 billion
    • Company: eBay — $36.6 billion net worth

    Pierre Omidyar might officially be the sole founder of eBay, but his partner Jeffrey Skoll was key to the online company’s success. Armed with a Stanford MBA, Skoll joined Omidyar in 1995, when the latter invited him to draw up a business plan for his company, Auction Web, which would go on to become eBay.

    Complementary skills and shared values are often the ingredients for successful business partnerships. Omidyar was the computer programmer, while Skoll was the businessman. However, both brought a democratic approach to eBay, referring to their customers as “the community.” And that outlook helped them achieve great success. On its first day as a public company in 1998, eBay traded 218 million shares.

    Omidyar was chairman of the board of eBay until 2005, though he still sits on the board. Skoll left eBay in 2001 to focus on his own projects, including the charity organization Skoll Foundation and the production company Participant Media.

    Related: 15 Best and Worst Cities in America to Start a Small Business

    • Gordon Moore net worth: $7 billion
    • Bob Noyce net worth: $3.7 billion
    • Company: Intel — $59.39 in revenue in 2016

    The tech industry has long been a cutthroat business, and the founders of Intel — Gordon Moore and Bob Noyce — know this better than most. Moore and Noyce both worked with early Silicon Valley magnate William Shockley at Shockley Semiconductor Laboratory until 1957, when they abandoned him and his tyrannical management style. They would go on to found Intel in 1968.

    Harmonious personalities helped Moore and Noyce become some of the best business partners in the industry. Noyce and his visionary, big-picture mentality meshed well with the reflective, mild-mannered Moore, who preferred working with technology. In November 1971, the company launched the Intel 4004, the first general-purpose programmable processor, which became the model microprocessor used in many PCs.

    • Jerry Yang net worth: $2.3 billion
    • David Filo net worth: $3.4 billion
    • Company: Yahoo — $30 billion net worth

    Jerry Yang and David Filo came up with the idea for Yahoo while trying to avoid doing their school work. As doctoral candidates at Stanford in 1994, Filo and Yang were tasked with developing a new line of computer chips. Without supervision, they instead spent much of their time surfing the internet.

    Procrastination usually isn’t a good thing, but Filo and Yang’s obsession with the internet led them to start categorizing their favorite sites. Until that time, the web lacked formal organization. What began as the informal “David and Jerry’s Guide to the Web” soon transformed into a website that, by November 1994, was attracting 170,000 visitors a day. By then, they had changed the site’s name to Yahoo. In this way, the pair was able to turn a hobby into a business venture.

    Although Filo and Yang were young and inexperienced, their talent and vision lured Silicon Valley venture capitalist Mike Moritz into investing $1 million in Yahoo. The search engine is still alive and well today.

    • Michael Eisner net worth: $1 billion
    • Frank Wells net worth: unknown
    • Company: Disney — $55.37 billion in revenue in 2016

    You might not expect Michael Eisner to be on a list of the best business partners, considering he was voted out as chairman of Disney in 2004. But when CEO Eisner was matched with new Disney president, Frank Wells, in 1984, the pair brought the storied film company back to life.

    When Eisner and Wells joined Disney, the company was struggling and nearly acquired by competitors. However, the combination of Eisner’s creative energy and enthusiasm and Wells’ pragmatism and business acumen helped turn Disney into the No. 1 studio at the box office by 1988.

    *Net worth information was taken from Celebrity Net Worth, TheRichest, Forbes, Inc., Time and MarketWatch.

  • How to Know When You Should Partner With a Nonprofit

    For the current crop of startups, it’s not just about creating the next big thing: Making an impact on the world is just as critical.

    Related: How You Can Identify and Optimize Nonprofit Partnerships

    That’s why startup partnerships with nonprofit organizations are now more important than ever, and new opportunities are popping up every day. For instance, while malaria used to be the primary public health concern in Africa, GeekWire has reported that cancer may now be the continent’s biggest health threat, according to recent data.

    To combat this, Seattle nonprofit BIO Ventures for Global Health partnered in June with the African Organisation for Research and Training in Cancer, to create the African Access Initiative. The Initiative will bring in pharmaceutical and biotech companies, such as Pfizer and Takeda, to aid in the fight against cancer.

    In a perfect world, a union between a startup and a nonprofit will always make sense. Complementary resources and common goals will also surely help, while timing is just as big a factor.

    Timing Is everything.

    From the moment it opens its doors, a startup is running on borrowed time. Research by Statistic Brain has pointed to data showing that 25 percent of startups fail within the first year, 36 percent falter after two and 55 percent are dead by the end of year five.

    Needless to say, then, every day counts for all young companies, including those that partner with nonprofits. The timing of any partnership must be strategic and help both sides get the most out of the union.

    What do you see the fruits of your labor looking like a month from now? How about six months — or years– from now? Decide what success looks like now, and work toward creating the change your partnership hopes to see.

    Through my company’s partnership with the Clinton Global Initiative and the China Association for Integrative Medicine, we’re providing monthly training sessions throughout China to teach locals how to tend to burn victims. The sessions provide immediate training and assistance in the communities that need it, while also building a long-term system of burn specialists who can service their chosen areas and serve as ambassadors for the company’s joint venture and its chosen charitable organization.

    Deliberate timing is vital for both sides of a startup-nonprofit partnership. It ensures that each can pull its own weight and operate at a high frequency.

    Related: How Your Business Can Build Lasting Partnerships With Startups

    Taking the plunge With a nonprofit

    Thirty percent of respondents in the Statistic Brain study cited “unbalanced experience or lack of managerial experience” as a reason for startup failure; and one of the subcategory reasons was too-rapid expansion, which occurs in a partnership when one or both partners are not ready. This is why it’s so important to evaluate your company’s financial and structural status to make sure your startup is healthy enough to join hands with a nonprofit.

    Assuming you’ve found that perfect nonprofit, here are three questions to ask yourself to make sure the timing is right:

    1. Where do we stand financially? Take the temperature of most failed startups, and you’ll find that finances played a hand in a good chunk of their respective downfalls. Forty-six percent of the Statistic Brain respondents listed “incompetence” as the reason for startup failures, with reasons such as “emotional pricing” and lack of knowledge in pricing and finances named as factors.

    When entering any partnership — especially one involving a nonprofit — ensure that your finances can stand up. Determine whether you’re on solid enough ground to donate both time and your young company’s scant financial resources. The point of that donation: to help a nonprofit that may also be trying to make its mark but is not as focused as you are, on finances.

    2. Are we structurally sound? Money is one factor, albeit an important one, for determining how ready your startup is for a nonprofit teammate. But what about the other aspects of your company’s health? In other words, do you have the personnel, work capacity and other support in place to make sure both parties benefit from this union?

    Be strategic when entering a partnership, and make sure your company is equipped to handle the load. Strategic timing helps companies understand how a partnership could contribute to both organizations’ health, in terms of size and scalability. For example, a small startup collaborating with a large nonprofit could find itself disregarded by others in the space despite heavy contributions to the partnership. This is especially true if the nonprofit’s mission isn’t updated to reflect the partnership’s new objectives.

    3. Do both brands look good to the public? Strategic timing is crucial, but don’t ignore circumstantial timing, which isn’t controlled by individuals and companies, but instead by public opinion. Ensure that your company and its potential nonprofit partner have solid public images so that a bad press story or a single indiscretion won’t cast a poor light on your brand or its efforts.

    Once that’s determined, figure out where your respective brands complement each other. Brand alignment is key for building partnerships, so understand how your mission coincides with that of your potential nonprofit partner. To understand how you can help, understand the needs of your preferred nonprofits and identify gaps in their assistance.

    Still unsure about the goal you want to focus on? Check the U.N.’s website and review its 17 sustainable development goals to see whether one fits with your company’s current mission statement. From there, perform an internal review to see how your partnership could take advantage of existing infrastructures. Pursuing relevant, timely causes will help ensure that your efforts go to those which need it most and that your startup makes the most of its limited time and resources.

    Related: Even Social Entrepreneurs Need to Meet Their Goals

    A startup/nonprofit partnership can be great for all parties involved, but it must be initiated at the right time. Ask the questions that get to the core of what your company — and its potential philanthropic partner — represent in order to determine whether now is the time to make things official.

  • Need a Network? Be Bold.

    The tools are there for you to reach those who can help build your dream.

  • How Canada became an education superpower

    Canada 150Image copyright
    Reuters

    Image caption

    Canada has climbed into the top tier of education rankings

    When there are debates about the world’s top performing education systems, the names that usually get mentioned are the Asian powerhouses such as Singapore and South Korea or the Nordic know-alls, such as Finland or Norway.

    But with much less recognition, Canada has climbed into the top tier of international rankings.

    In the most recent round of international Pisa tests, Canada was one of a handful of countries to appear in the top 10 for maths, science and reading.

    The tests, run by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), are a major study of educational performance and show Canada’s teenagers as among the best educated in the world.

    They are far ahead of geographical neighbours such as the US and European countries with strong cultural ties like the UK and France.

    At university level, Canada has the world’s highest proportion of working-age adults who have been through higher education – 55% compared with an average in OECD countries of 35%.

    Migrant students

    Canada’s success in school tests is also very unusual compared with other international trends.

    The top performers are often cohesive, compact societies and the current highest achiever, Singapore, has been seen as a model of systematic progress, with each part of the education system integrated into an overarching national strategy.

    Image copyright
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    Canada has been much more successful in education than its US neighbour

    Canada does not even really have a national education system, it is based on autonomous provinces and it is hard to think of a bigger contrast between a city state such as Singapore and a sprawling land mass such as Canada.

    The OECD, trying to understand Canada’s success in education, described the role of the federal government as “limited and sometimes non-existent”.

    Also not widely recognised is that Canada has a high level of migrants in its school population.

    More than a third of young adults in Canada are from families where both parents are from another country.

    But the children of newly-arrived, migrant families seem to integrate rapidly enough to perform at the same high level as their classmates.

    Image copyright
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    Swearing-in day ceremony for new Canadian citizens

    When the most recent Pisa rankings are looked at more closely, at regional rather than national level, the results for Canada are even more remarkable.

    If Canadian provinces entered Pisa tests as separate countries, three of them, Alberta, British Columbia and Quebec, would be in the top five places for science in the world, alongside Singapore and Japan and above the likes of Finland and Hong Kong.

    So how has Canada overtaken so many other countries in education?

    Andreas Schleicher, the OECD’s education director, says Canada’s “big uniting theme is equity”.

    Despite the different policies in individual provinces, there is a common commitment to an equal chance in school.

    He says there is a strong sense of fairness and equal access – and this is seen in the high academic performance of migrant children.


    Global education

    Ideas for the Global education series? Get in touch.


    Within three years of arriving, the Pisa tests show the children of new migrants have scores as high as the rest of their schoolmates.

    It makes Canada one of the few countries where migrant children achieve at a level similar to their non-migrant counterparts.

    Another distinguishing feature is that Canada’s teachers are well paid by international standards – and entry into teaching is highly selective.

    Equal chances

    Prof John Jerrim, of the UCL Institute of Education in London, says that Canada’s high league table ranking reflects the narrow socio-economic gap in school results.

    Rather than a country of extremes, Canada’s results show a very high average, with relatively little difference between advantaged and disadvantaged students.

    Image copyright
    Getty Images

    Image caption

    Canada pays high teacher salaries by international standards

    In the most recent Pisa results for science, the variation in scores in Canada caused by socio-economic differences was 9%, compared with 20% in France and 17% in Singapore.

    The equitable outcome goes a long way to explaining why Canada is doing so well in international tests. It does not have a tail of underachievement, often related to poverty.

    It is a remarkably consistent system. As well as little variation between rich and poor students, there is very little variation in results between schools, compared with the average for developed countries.

    Rather than high levels of immigration being seen as a potential drag on results, Prof Jerrim says in Canada’s case, this is likely to be part of its success story.

    Migrants coming to Canada, many from countries such as China, India and Pakistan, are often relatively well-educated and ambitious to see their children get into professional careers.

    Prof Jerrim says these families have an immigrant “hunger” to succeed, and their high expectations are likely to boost school results for their children.

    This has been a bumper year for education in Canada.

    The universities are reaping the benefits of the Trump effect, with record levels of applications from overseas students seeing Canada as a North American alternative to the United States.

    There has also been a Canadian winner of the Global Teacher Prize, with Maggie MacDonnell using the award to campaign for indigenous students.

    As Canada marks its 150th anniversary, it can claim the status of an education superpower.